Comparing to Google
Graham Toal <[email protected]> Thu, 09 Nov 2006 16:08:36 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4553a6e4.30631n1XFo2A4WOk%[email protected]> |
A couple of months ago I lost my hard drive, and when I rebuilt my system I decided not to reinstall spamprobe et al because all the local spam filtering had been keeping a high load average on my system for some years now (mainly because I was also collecting junk mail for about 2000 dead addresses as training data). So now what I do is immediately turn all incoming mail around to a Google mailbox, and Google forwards the spam-filtered mail back to me. I've been doing this for nearly a month now, long enough to compare against the spamprobe setup I had before. Result: Spamprobe (and associated programs that I used to use) - great, Google - crap. I've gone from barely any spam at all to a dozen spam or more per day. Conclusion, time to reinstall spamprobe (but just for me this time, not with the 2000+ accounts going through the whole filter chain...) Shame, I really hoped that Google would have done all the hard work for me. I wonder if they could use an anti-spam programmer... Graham ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642