Re: Comparing to Google
Brian Burton <[email protected]> Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:47:26 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Graham Toal wrote: > Result: Spamprobe (and associated programs that I used to use) - great, > Google - crap. I've gone from barely any spam at all to a dozen spam or more > per day. Conclusion, time to reinstall spamprobe (but just for me this time, > not with the 2000+ accounts going through the whole filter chain...) Wow! I thought google did everything better than everyone else. Glad to hear they're mortal. :-) I wonder if they have to make compromises to manage the amount of space personalized databases would take? I haven't read anything about their algorithms. I'd be curious to know what they do in their filters. > Shame, I really hoped that Google would have done all the hard work for me. > I wonder if they could use an anti-spam programmer... I really like living in a rural, low priced area. Home prices in California make my eyes pop out and, frankly, that's not a good look for me. :-) All the best, ++Brian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Spamprobe-users mailing list Spamprobe-users-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamprobe-users
PGP.sig
(application/pgp-signature, 512 B) - not displayed