Re: Comparing to Google

Brian Burton <[email protected]> Thu, 09 Nov 2006 17:47:26 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Graham Toal wrote:
> Result: Spamprobe (and associated programs that I used to use) - great,
> Google - crap.  I've gone from barely any spam at all to a dozen spam or more
> per day.   Conclusion, time to reinstall spamprobe (but just for me this time,
> not with the 2000+ accounts going through the whole filter chain...)

Wow!  I thought google did everything better than everyone else.
Glad to hear they're mortal. :-)

I wonder if they have to make compromises to manage the amount of
space personalized databases would take?  I haven't read anything
about their algorithms.  I'd be curious to know what they do
in their filters.


> Shame, I really hoped that Google would have done all the hard work for me.
> I wonder if they could use an anti-spam programmer...

I really like living in a rural, low priced area. Home prices in California
make my eyes pop out and, frankly, that's not a good look for me. :-)

All the best,
++Brian

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642

_______________________________________________
Spamprobe-users mailing list
Spamprobe-users-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamprobe-users
PGP.sig (application/pgp-signature, 512 B) - not displayed