qsf
Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:51:30 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I got curious abou the qsf that Anthony Campbell mentioned: ----- Forwarded message from Andrew Wood ----- > I'm considering changing to using qsf. It looks identical to spamprobe > which I've been using for years (multi-word token bayesian filter written > in C). How is qsf better? I'm not familiar with spamprobe enough to give a point-by-point comparison. QSF has some additional features built into its tokeniser so it can detect common spammer tricks and treat them as tokens in their own right (it creates pseudo-tokens such as "comments-in-HTML" and "gibberish-consonants"). It's also small, fast, and accurate. Other than that, it's a reasonably standard Bayesian-like filter. - Andrew ----- End forwarded message ----- -- "force, my friends, is violence; the supreme authority from which all other authority is derived." http://www.ChaosReigns.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV