qsf

Darxus-5+gNnNaL/BD/[email protected] Wed, 10 Jan 2007 11:51:30 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I got curious abou the qsf that Anthony Campbell mentioned:

----- Forwarded message from Andrew Wood -----

> I'm considering changing to using qsf.  It looks identical to spamprobe
> which I've been using for years (multi-word token bayesian filter written
> in C).  How is qsf better?

I'm not familiar with spamprobe enough to give a point-by-point comparison.
QSF has some additional features built into its tokeniser so it can detect
common spammer tricks and treat them as tokens in their own right (it
creates pseudo-tokens such as "comments-in-HTML" and
"gibberish-consonants"). It's also small, fast, and accurate. Other than
that, it's a reasonably standard Bayesian-like filter.

- Andrew


----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
"force, my friends, is violence; the supreme authority
from which all other authority is derived."
http://www.ChaosReigns.com

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV