Re: Inline image spams and "-o whitelist"

On Jan 10, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 10 Jan 2007, Nikolaus Hiebaum wrote:
>>
>> How can I include the new option in my existing .procmailrc rule  
>> because I
>> don't want to lose the "traditional" SpamProbe functionality.
>>
> [snip]
>
> Actually, for me the original way of using spamprobe was better. With
> the new one I was seeing a lot of random text stuff getting through,
> especially those with an html link in the body.

   I think the intent was what Nikolaus indicated a desire for.  To  
only use the "-o whitelist" for messages that met a specific  
qualification.  In this case, had inline'd images in the mail message  
body.

   As I think Brian may've referred to in his first message,  
something like:

:0B
* src *= *(3D)? *"? *cid:
{
   :0c
   | /usr/local/bin/spamprobe remove

   :0
   XSCORE=| /usr/local/bin/spamprobe -T -o whitelist score

   :0 wf
   | formail -I "X-SpamProbe-Headers: $XSCORE"

   :0 :
   * ^X-SpamProbe-Headers: SPAM
   $MAILDIR/.inlines/
}

   Put at the end of your [Nikolaus] .procmailrc.  Tho, that last  
segment will put it into a folder called .inlines, so that you can  
later check for false postitives for this specific thing.  If you  
wanted it to just be filed with the rest of your spam, you could put  
it into "IN.SPAM" like the rest of the things the first-pass of spam- 
probe thought were spam.

                                     - Chris


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV