Spamprobe in scoring (was: qsf)
"Jem" <[email protected]> Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:15:36 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> From my limited experience so far, I'd say run qsf and spamprobe > together. Currently I'm using spamprobe to catch whatever qsf misses, > which is about 5 or 6 a day after very limited training (about 150 > spams). They seem to complement each other well. I'm seeing no spams at > all and no false positives. This reminds me of something I've been meaning to ask for some time: does anyone know of a good light-weight spam scoring software to use in conjunction with Spamprobe? This can be pieced together with fancy procmail rules but I think there should be a more elegant way to do it. Normally I would go straight to SpamAssassin but it's a large piece of software and unnecessary when spamprobe is doing most of the work. What I'm looking for (or might possibly write) is a tool which would use the Spamprobe score as one input among others, notably some RBL/DNSBL zones such as Spamhaus or perhaps other custom inputs such as the procmail recipes for detecting image spam. This might be useful to many Spamprobe users, since we often find it desirable to throw in an extra check such as some DNS-based blacklist or custom procmail rules WITHOUT making those an all-or-nothing decider. - Jem ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV