Re: Query/suggestion
"Jem" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Query: > Are other users still getting 98% or better efficiency from spamprobe? I have been using my current database for over a year, with very little modification (I only do 'score' and train-good or train-spam on errors). I also have methods to do checks of the spam folder for false positives, and I do sometimes uncover false positives. Accuracy rates on the three accounts where I use it, for past week: 99.7% 99.4% 99.8% Those accuracy rates are all up since November, when I first started keeping score. ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click