Re: Query/suggestion

"Jem" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spamprobe.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> Query:
> Are other users still getting 98% or better efficiency from spamprobe?

I have been using my current database for over a year, with very little 
modification (I only do 'score' and train-good or train-spam on errors). I 
also have methods to do checks of the spam folder for false positives, and 
I do sometimes uncover false positives.

Accuracy rates on the three accounts where I use it, for past week:
99.7%
99.4%
99.8%

Those accuracy rates are all up since November, when I first started 
keeping score.





-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.