Re: Problem creating database

although strictly unnecessary, I think create command would be very useful. This wasted about 15 minutes of my time trying to figure
out how to create the initial database ... even when I figured out to use "receive" I was nervious that it would enter in bogus
terms on a null input.





> Sean Rima wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 08:47:24AM -0500, David A. Lee wrote:
> >>I found a similar (frustrating) problem ... what I came up with as the "solution" is to do a receive. This works for me on hash
DB's
> >>
> >>spamprobe -d hash:40:.spamprobe receive
> >><control-D>
> >>
> >>This creates the database, and a "spamprobe counts" shows it didnt put in any scores.
> >
> > Never thought of that, still I got it working so I am happy :)
>
> Yes when you run SP with a read-only command SP opens the database in
> read only mode which prevents it from creating a new one if none is
> present.  I should add a "create" command I guess although I always just
> created the initial database by jumping right in with spam, good,
> train-spam, or train-good on a mailbox file.
>
> All the best,
> ++Brian
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Spamprobe-users mailing list
> Spamprobe-users-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamprobe-users
>



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click