Re: Upcoming new test-suite release -- please review! (was: SPF Implementation issues)

On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Julian Mehnle wrote:

> I added it in revision 94 of the test-suite trunk:
> 
>   http://www.openspf.org/source/project/test-suite/rfc4408-tests.yml?view=log
> 
> If no one objects, I'll make a new test-suite release of those and
> Stuart's changes in a week or so.

+  e14.example.com:
+    - SPF: v=spf1 a:example..com

There was already a test for this: invalid-domain-empty-label.  It currently
allows for either ignoring the empty label, or permerror.  If there is an
official errata requiring nomatch instead of permerror, then simply change
the result set of the existing test.  Or were you concerned about
2 adjacent dots vs 3?

+  e5a.example.com:
+    - SPF: v=spf1 a:museum

This seems to be not redundant.  However, it seems unintuitive to me that 
example..com must be ignored, but museum gets a permerr.

+  e11.example.com:
+    - SPF: v=spf1 exists:%{i}.%{l2r-}.user.%{d2}
+  1.2.3.4.gladstone.philip.user.example.com:
+    - A: 127.0.0.2

Good, but the actual failing example in the field used %{l1r-}.  Shouldn't
we use that?

-- 
	      Stuart D. Gathman <[email protected]>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.

-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/1007/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/1007/
Modify Your Subscription: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=6959932&id_secret=73243020-1b5b44
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com