Re: Upcoming new test-suite release -- please review! (was: SPF Implementation issues)

"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Dec 2007 13:42:51 -0500 (EST)

Newsgroups	gmane.mail.spam.spf.devel,gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:

> +  e5a.example.com:
> +    - SPF: v=spf1 a:museum
> 
> This seems to be not redundant.  However, it seems unintuitive to me that 
> example..com must be ignored, but museum gets a permerr.

How about this case:

Result: pass ?

e5b.example.com:
  - SPF: v=spf1 a:museum.

-- 
	      Stuart D. Gathman <[email protected]>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.

-------------------------------------------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org
Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/1007/=now
RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/1007/
Modify Your Subscription: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=6959932&id_secret=73253028-744825
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com