Re: Upcoming new test-suite release
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Dec 2007 22:00:38 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.devel,gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Julian Mehnle wrote: > > > e5b.example.com: > > > - SPF: v=spf1 a:museum. > > > > What would be the point? "a:museum." is still a syntax error because > > the trailing dot doesn't count. The grammar doesn't allow "museum." > > for a <domain-spec>, just as it doesn't allow plain "museum". > > Since this isn't obvious, there should be a test case for both (with > and without trailing dot). But what are the chances of an implementation throwing PermError on "a:museum" but not on "a:museum."? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHWHEGwL7PKlBZWjsRAgM6AKDjAJtOfT12dEGtx1AUgKtBB0IWSgCg3tCD igT8geUkz8rMqSTIK/DV7Tk= =2znC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------- Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/1007/=now RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/1007/ Modify Your Subscription: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=6959932&id_secret=73352319-755d26 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com