Re: Re: Upcoming new test-suite release
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Dec 2007 17:08:48 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.devel,gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Julian Mehnle wrote: > > Since this isn't obvious, there should be a test case for both (with > > and without trailing dot). > > But what are the chances of an implementation throwing PermError on > "a:museum" but not on "a:museum."? This is a test suite. Such considerations do not apply. Ideally, all bizarre wrong behaviour should be flagged. In practice, we can't hit it all. But deliberately throwing out a case we actually thought of, just because we feel no one would make that mistake, is a silly mistake. The very act of making *that* silly mistake will cause someone else to make the other mistake, via a quantum mechanical application of Murphy's Law. I'll go ahead and add the trailing dot case, if you are *sure* that both should be permerror. The inconsistency is very ugly, but I suppose it can't be helped. At least these are corner cases. -- Stuart D. Gathman <[email protected]> Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154 "Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial. ------------------------------------------- Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/1007/=now RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/1007/ Modify Your Subscription: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=6959932&id_secret=73358020-ae1c80 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com