Re: Upcoming new test-suite release
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> Thu, 6 Dec 2007 22:52:08 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.devel,gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Julian Mehnle wrote: > > But what are the chances of an implementation throwing PermError on > > "a:museum" but not on "a:museum."? > > This is a test suite. Such considerations do not apply. Oh, I think they do. Maintainability and leanness do matter. They're just not top priorities. > Ideally, all bizarre wrong behaviour should be flagged. In practice, we > can't hit it all. But deliberately throwing out a case we actually > thought of, just because we feel no one would make that mistake, is a > silly mistake. The very act of making *that* silly mistake will cause > someone else to make the other mistake, via a quantum mechanical > application of Murphy's Law. I don't follow entirely ;-) ... > I'll go ahead and add the trailing dot case, if you are *sure* that > both should be permerror. The inconsistency is very ugly, but I > suppose it can't be helped. At least these are corner cases. ... but I don't have a problem with adding it if others think it is useful. Please do go ahead. I am 100% certain that both "museum" and "museum." are NOT valid <domain-spec>s per RFC 4408. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHWH0YwL7PKlBZWjsRAgx7AKCPXz4uZ7W4YxpopesKOc4fKmGNlgCg8orw da3+otCH6ypDcEN5xj3QsSw= =C6ip -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------- Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org Archives: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/1007/=now RSS Feed: http://v2.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/1007/ Modify Your Subscription: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=6959932&id_secret=73380679-1c2b5a Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com