Re: More about the SPF RRTYPE
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > I like TXT for unstructured data, I don't think it's ugly. For uniformity > with other protocols (DKIM, ADP, VBR, ...) we might introduce _spf.domain at > the same time as we deprecate type 99. While only updated software can query > _spf.domain directly, careful use of redirection and wildcards may provide > for some advantages. I think that type 99 is a lost cause for v=spf1, but should be kept in reserve for v=spf3 - where it would be a MUST. -- Stuart D. Gathman <[email protected]> Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154 "Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.