Re: Re: More about the SPF RRTYPE

Frank Ellermann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss
Message-ID <CAHhFybomatQ-DLzeH0iSP4C_HZZtk-jAauiEYX0VtXnUcSNROg@mail.gmail.com> 
On 20 August 2011 00:32, Commerco WebMaster wrote:

> Is there any place to view an outline for the minimum set of changes to
> which you refer?  It would be nice to confirm that our own v=spf1 records
> still conform to the draft as it stands today and that the records will
> continue to work with the changes to qualify v=spf1 for Standards Track.

If you are aware of the errata on openspf.org (no changes for three years)
it should roughly constitute the "minimum set of changes".

Actually Scott could publish his draft "as is", changing the draft name
from I-D.xxx-kitterman-yyy or similar to I-D.4408bis-yyy in a 4408bis WG
later is common practice.

-Frank
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.