Re: Re: More about the SPF RRTYPE

On Friday, August 19, 2011 08:12:28 PM you wrote:
> On 20 August 2011 00:32, Commerco WebMaster wrote:
> > Is there any place to view an outline for the minimum set of changes to
> > which you refer?  It would be nice to confirm that our own v=spf1 records
> > still conform to the draft as it stands today and that the records will
> > continue to work with the changes to qualify v=spf1 for Standards Track.
> 
> If you are aware of the errata on openspf.org (no changes for three years)
> it should roughly constitute the "minimum set of changes".
> 
> Actually Scott could publish his draft "as is", changing the draft name
> from I-D.xxx-kitterman-yyy or similar to I-D.4408bis-yyy in a 4408bis WG
> later is common practice.

Scott needs to find some time to beat it into a reasonably stable state first.

Scott K