Re: Review of draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting

Long ago, Nostradamus foresaw that on 02/03/2012 05:33 PM, Scott
Kitterman would write:
> I think this is getting close to ready, so I would appreciate it if people 
> here would review the draft and provide comments:
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting/?include_text=1
>
Shouldn't the spec mention explicitly that the requested "report" should
be a DSN?  This is implied by mentioning DSN in security considerations,
and including DSN in the informative links.  But I found myself thinking
the whole time while reading the spec, "so what format are the reports in?"