Re: Review of draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting

On Sunday, February 05, 2012 08:19:28 PM you wrote:
> Long ago, Nostradamus foresaw that on 02/03/2012 05:33 PM, Scott
> 
> Kitterman would write:
> > I think this is getting close to ready, so I would appreciate it if
> > people here would review the draft and provide comments:
> > 
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-marf-spf-reporting/?include_t
> > ext=1
> Shouldn't the spec mention explicitly that the requested "report" should
> be a DSN?  This is implied by mentioning DSN in security considerations,
> and including DSN in the informative links.  But I found myself thinking
> the whole time while reading the spec, "so what format are the reports in?"

This is in many respects similar to a DSN (so the considerations are simlar), 
but it's not a DSN, it's an ARF.  This is clarified in the drafts that go with 
this:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-marf-as/
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-marf-authfailure-report/

Thanks for reviewing.

Scott K