RE: Re: [spf-help] SRS for Exim
Tony Finch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.srs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Seth Goodman wrote: > Actually, you are no more immune to a DDoS attack with SPF than with SES. > The attack method is slightly different, but the bandwidth and CPU > consequences are virtually identical. The difference though is that the DDOS attack caused by all the CBVs from a joe job is unintentional in a way that a direct DDOS attack is not -- it's a side-effect of a spam run. At least CBVs do not magnify the attack capacity of a spammer's zombie farm... -- Tony Finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/