gmane.mail.spam.srs.general

880 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.

Re: Uploaded my SRS implementation for courier to the web
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:22:01 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #881
Uploaded my SRS implementation for courier to the web
Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:30:28 +0100
Matthias Wimmer <[email protected]> • #880
Wrapper around libsrs2 for Courier
Fri, 16 Mar 2007 01:21:37 +0100
Matthias Wimmer <[email protected]> • #879
Is libsrs2 completely dead?
Thu, 15 Mar 2007 21:27:46 +0100
Matthias Wimmer <[email protected]> • #878
Re: SRS and Callbacks
Mon, 15 Jan 2007 21:19:49 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #877
Re: SRS and Callbacks
Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:24:56 -0500
Chris Sweeney <[email protected]> • #876
Re: SRS and Callbacks
Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:29:28 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #875
SRS and Callbacks
Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:17:18 -0500
Chris Sweeney <[email protected]> • #874
Re: SRS and Callbacks
Mon, 15 Jan 2007 01:24:48 -0500
Chris Sweeney <[email protected]> • #873
Re: SRS and Callbacks
Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:05:38 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #872
SRS in .forward not working for me. help please.
Thu, 7 Dec 2006 10:25:51 +0100
"Edward Arrigo" <[email protected]> • #871
RE: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?
Sat, 2 Dec 2006 11:24:42 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #870
(unknown)
Sat, 2 Dec 2006 01:33:18 -0200
"Deisi" <[email protected]> • #869
RE: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?
Fri, 1 Dec 2006 20:24:50 -0600
"Seth Goodman" <[email protected]> • #868
Re: SPF tracking exist mechanisms
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 19:37:27 -0500
Michael Weiner <[email protected]> • #867
SPF tracking exist mechanisms
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:51:15 -0600
wayne <[email protected]> • #866
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?
Fri, 1 Dec 2006 23:32:02 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #865
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spf fail?
Fri, 1 Dec 2006 16:20:49 -0500
"Dick St.Peters" <[email protected]> • #864
Re: Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spf fail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:49:35 +0000
David Woodhouse <[email protected]> • #863
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 10:14:46 -0500
Michael Weiner <[email protected]> • #862
RE: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:18:22 GMT
Mark <[email protected]> • #861
RE: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:09:41 GMT
Mark <[email protected]> • #860
RE: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:59:36 GMT
Mark <[email protected]> • #859
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spf fail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 10:39:14 -0500
"John A. Martin" <[email protected]> • #858
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spf fail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:13:20 +0000
David Woodhouse <[email protected]> • #857
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:08:23 -0600
wayne <[email protected]> • #856
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?
Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:56:44 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #855
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spf fail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:51:22 -0600
wayne <[email protected]> • #854
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 14:48:48 +0000
David Woodhouse <[email protected]> • #853
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:39:32 -0600
wayne <[email protected]> • #852
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spf fail?
Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:25:58 -0500
"Dick St.Peters" <[email protected]> • #851
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spf fail?
Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:04:54 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #850
Re: Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 8:44:54 -0500
Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> • #849
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:32:55 -0500
"John A. Martin" <[email protected]> • #848
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spf fail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 13:00:50 +0000
David Woodhouse <[email protected]> • #847
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:45:16 +0000
Camart Ltd <[email protected]> • #846
RE: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:32:36 GMT
Mark <[email protected]> • #845
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spf fail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:22:25 +0000
Camart Ltd <[email protected]> • #844
RE: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:20:51 GMT
Mark <[email protected]> • #843
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spf fail?
Fri, 1 Dec 2006 10:45:05 +0000
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> • #842
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spf fail?
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 10:12:25 +0000
David Woodhouse <[email protected]> • #841
Re: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spf fail?
Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:08:46 -0500 (EST)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #840
private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spf fail?
Thu, 30 Nov 2006 13:22:39 +0000
Camart Office <[email protected]> • #839
RE: Re: SRS for postfix ?
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 00:53:19 -0400 (EDT)
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> • #838
RE: Re: SRS for postfix ?
Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:22:40 -0400
"Dick St.Peters" <[email protected]> • #837
Re: seeing SRS0 in email from field
Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:11:17 -0500
"David Nicol" <[email protected]> • #836
Re: seeing SRS0 in email from field
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 15:11:12 -0700
Dan <[email protected]> • #835
Re: SRS for postfix ?
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:12:41 -0400
"John A. Martin" <[email protected]> • #834
Re: Re: SRS for postfix ?
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:05:05 +0200
Xavier Beaudouin <[email protected]> • #833
RE: Re: SRS for postfix ?
Thu, 17 Aug 2006 16:04:28 -0400
"Blum, Gabriel" <[email protected]> • #832