RE: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?

Mark <[email protected]> Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:09:41 GMT
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.srs.general
Organization Asarian-host
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stuart D. Gathman [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: vrijdag 1 december 2006 15:57
> To: SRS discussions
> Subject: Re: [srs-discuss] private relay ... could i use srs 
> to avoid spffail?
> 
> 
> Yes it does.  Another problem is broken MTAs that think '+' is
> an illegal localpart char. 

Sendmail has been doing "plussed" addresses for ages. Rejecting "plussed"
addresses is dead wrong. And I honestly cannot believe there's still major
MTA software out there (like sendmail or postfix) that would still do
that.

In abundance perhaps, but neither SPF nor SRS can be blamed for such
gross brokenness, of course. Who'd wanna run a broken mail server like
that anyway?

- Mark 
 
        System Administrator Asarian-host.org
 
---
"If you were supposed to understand it,
we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx