RE: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?
Mark <[email protected]> Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:09:41 GMT
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.srs.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Asarian-host |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Stuart D. Gathman [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: vrijdag 1 december 2006 15:57 > To: SRS discussions > Subject: Re: [srs-discuss] private relay ... could i use srs > to avoid spffail? > > > Yes it does. Another problem is broken MTAs that think '+' is > an illegal localpart char. Sendmail has been doing "plussed" addresses for ages. Rejecting "plussed" addresses is dead wrong. And I honestly cannot believe there's still major MTA software out there (like sendmail or postfix) that would still do that. In abundance perhaps, but neither SPF nor SRS can be blamed for such gross brokenness, of course. Who'd wanna run a broken mail server like that anyway? - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org --- "If you were supposed to understand it, we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx