RE: Re: SRS for postfix ?

=20
>> SRS for forwarding is only needed by forwarders with
clueless/powerless clients.

Agree, but unfortunately that's what plenty of big companies are,
specially those in non-tech industries.

They usually have bloated IT departments with uninteligent and/or
exaggerated security policies and bureaucracy that makes it real hard -
if even possible - to get yourself into a "trusted" list of anything.=20

The reality of most of the biggest companies in the world is that each
department is a huge organization by itself, independent from each
other, hiring most services outside mostly (specially after the
tercerization + focus-on-core-business idea appeared).=20

It's not acceptable for us, who provide distribution of regulatory and
compliance documents, neither for the the client that hire us, that we
must first get approval of the "IT department" -- which might never
happen.

I do not wish to go offtopic, just felt like emphasizing that while your
affirmative is true, the population of "clueless/powerless clients" is
not a minority -- neither in size nor in importance.

Back to SRS, I still think would be great if the promoters of SRS would
provide us with patches for those cases where MTA devs didn't feel like
SRS was important (e.g. postfix)=20

Best Regards,
Gabriel Blum

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

The information in this Internet email is confidential and may be legally p=
rivileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this email =
by anyone else is unauthorized.