RE: private relay ... could i use srs to avoid spffail?

Stuart D. Gathman wrote on Friday, December 01, 2006 8:57 AM -0600:

> On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, wayne wrote:
> 
> > Some people have also suggested that by using SRS on all outgoing
> > email lets you reject bogus bounces, but in order to do that you
> > have to make sure that *ALL* legitimate email sent using your
> > domain name gets processed by SRS.  Roaming users and people
> > working form home and such have to be tought to always use
> > RFC2476's SMTP submission port (587).
> 
> Making roaming users always relay through home is essential for a
> decent SPF policy also.  Note that Outlook must use smtps (465)
> instead. Another solution is an SSH tunnel (e.g. Putty for Windows)
> or a VPN.

I use Outhouse and send mail through some MTA's on port 587, some on
port 465.  What is the problem you see when your users try port 587?

-- 
Seth Goodman