Re: Re: [spf-help] SRS for Exim

On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 12:42:04PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
| > It would be good to add a mechanism to SPF that allows a domain to state
| > that it signs its sender addresses; these addresses should not then be
| > rewritten when forwarded and should be verified by the recipient using
| > callouts or perhaps public key crypto (if that can be made to work).
| 
| This is an excellent idea that Meng should seriously consider.  In addition,
| since SES addresses can be much simpler than SRS addresses, we would ideally
| allow for the alternate address format in the case that the domain declares
| in it's SPF record that it SES signs all outgoing mail.  That one sounds
| like a win-win.  Let the domain owners decide which verification mechanism
| they wish to use.

i would be happy to do that.  how about a modifier like srs=decline or
would ses=always be more appropriate?