Re: CBV

Meng Weng Wong <[email protected]> Thu, 29 Apr 2004 16:03:11 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.mail.spam.srs.general
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 02:57:14PM -0500, Seth Goodman wrote:
| 
| Thinking about this further, a full signed return-path address should never
| appear in an MUA anyway.  I say this since the Return-Path: header in a
| successfully delivered message cannot, by definition, be used to send a
| legitimate DSN.  Therefore, the signed address has no legitimate use at this
| point since it will not accept normal (non-DSN) mail.

If an SES message has a dozen addresses on a CC line, and one of those
addresses is a web archiver, another is a regular user, and a third
address bounces, the same message with a single SES

 - has been successfully delivered,
 - is the cause of a DSN,
 - is exposed to the web.