Re: Re: [spf-help] SRS for Exim
Tony Finch <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.srs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, wayne wrote: > > >> BTFOOM why redirect is a modifier instead of a mechanism like > >> include. They both change the SPF result. Once upon a time, the > >> "all" mechanism was a modifier too. > > > > So for general understanding, what determines whether something should be a > > mechanism or a modifier? > > Now, the "all" mechanism is allowed to appear more than once because > it is a mechanism, but anything after the first all mechanism doesn't > do anything. This would also be true for redirect if that were a mechanism. > Mechanisms can have prefixes, modifiers can't. Perhaps this is the key. What would the prefix on a redirect mean? And on an SES check? -- Tony Finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/