Re: Testing SRS

On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 07:17, Roger Moser wrote:
> James Couzens wrote:
> 
> > It is not recommended to change to -all yet as we
> > need to reach critical mass first or else you will
> > likely loose mails for those who have not yet
> > heard about or implemented SPF.
> 
> Well, of 2843 SPF records of different domains that my mail server has
> examined in the last month 2550 have '-all'. That's 90%.
> 94 have '~all',  136 have '?all', and 1 has 'all' (simplet.irislink.com).

This is there choice, but as we saw last week, Verizon didn't have a
great time of it.  There just aren't enough publishing domains for the
big mail servers to be doing this sort of thing imo.

Cheers,

James

-- 
James Couzens,
Programmer
-----------------------------------------------------------------
XML is WRONG, and here it doesn't BELONG.
Neither in SPF, nor inside of DNS,
its fat and its bloated and so I express:
JSON - "The FAT FREE alternative to XML"
http://www.crockford.com/JSON/xml.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBD3BF855

-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[email protected]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAzGMRUGWbXgIxVC0RAhYUAKDQX4bYosDDmLz8np7wEOlYaqwuugCeL1eq
ri40R7agYHEV27fGE6cBMQI=
=2gg9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----