Re: Testing SRS

James Couzens <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.srs.general
Organization 6o4.ca
Message-ID <1087139125.15779.1.camel@code3>
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 07:53, Bill Maidment wrote:

> I use the -all for 5 domains, including a major Australian company, with 
> no ill effects. Surely if the SPF is not being checked, then there is no 
> risk. The only risk I see is for servers that don't check the SPF correctly.
> 
> Am I correct, or is there another issue I'm missing here?

Unless you are doing NO forwarding you would be ok, since all e-mail
leaving your domains would all be valid when SPF checked, but if any of
your users are forwarding their addresses to other accounts, and your
record is evaluated by another MTA parsing, those forwards will be
denied.

Cheers,

James

-- 
James Couzens,
Programmer
-----------------------------------------------------------------
XML is WRONG, and here it doesn't BELONG.
Neither in SPF, nor inside of DNS,
its fat and its bloated and so I express:
JSON - "The FAT FREE alternative to XML"
http://www.crockford.com/JSON/xml.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library
http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBD3BF855

-------
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, 
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[email protected]
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAzG01UGWbXgIxVC0RApHZAJ4oO0AJkUjUbBJ8i7IhsCuSXOcYKACgiFop
eL6c34b+9H9pFq43ZfT5tko=
=2tBt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.