Re: Testing SRS
James Couzens <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.srs.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | 6o4.ca |
| Message-ID | <1087139125.15779.1.camel@code3> |
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 07:53, Bill Maidment wrote: > I use the -all for 5 domains, including a major Australian company, with > no ill effects. Surely if the SPF is not being checked, then there is no > risk. The only risk I see is for servers that don't check the SPF correctly. > > Am I correct, or is there another issue I'm missing here? Unless you are doing NO forwarding you would be ok, since all e-mail leaving your domains would all be valid when SPF checked, but if any of your users are forwarding their addresses to other accounts, and your record is evaluated by another MTA parsing, those forwards will be denied. Cheers, James -- James Couzens, Programmer ----------------------------------------------------------------- XML is WRONG, and here it doesn't BELONG. Neither in SPF, nor inside of DNS, its fat and its bloated and so I express: JSON - "The FAT FREE alternative to XML" http://www.crockford.com/JSON/xml.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- http://libspf.org -- ANSI C Sender Policy Framework library http://libsrs.org -- ANSI C Sender Rewriting Scheme library ----------------------------------------------------------------- PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBD3BF855 ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAzG01UGWbXgIxVC0RApHZAJ4oO0AJkUjUbBJ8i7IhsCuSXOcYKACgiFop eL6c34b+9H9pFq43ZfT5tko= =2tBt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----