RE: More on Testing SRS
Michael Weiner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.srs.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | The UserFriendly Network (UFN) |
| Message-ID | <1087147540.3488.124.camel@nomad> |
On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 12:17 -0500, Seth Goodman wrote: > Your MX responded negatively to the CBV. It looks like the problem is at > your end. > SourceForge did the right thing. The sending system said the MAIL FROM: > address was no good, so SourceForge the mail. > > Look like you need to configure your MX to respond to CBV's, and it must > have the capability of validating SRS-signed addresses. Where i wouldnt disagree, i DO have the SRS stuff in sendmail, so i am not sure why thats not working. I have sendmail currently configured as in the description found at: http://asarian-host.net/srs/sendmailsrs.htm and the checks performed there work correctly. As for CBV responses, what is your suggestion for a sendmail MTA ? Any helpful "tip" pages? Michael Weiner ------- To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAzI4TOxX2KQ92qvoRAmdnAKCVsaw4QE77vqU+AGrm9lu7i5upmQCfVHYD hIPT2DIYzTxGaYzlB5wFwSs= =ww+w -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----