RE: Testing SRS
"Ryan Malayter" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.srs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[David Woodhouse] >Wrong. It's not about whether _you_ do any forwarding. It's about >whether any of the millions of addresses to which your users may send >email are doing forwarding. > >>I am using virtusertable redirects, but isn't SRS supposed >>to deal with this? > >If SRS is implemented at every forwarding site to which you ever send >email from the domain for which you publish a '-all' record, then yes. The SPF Publishing wizard (http://spf.pobox.com/wizard.html) uses -all in most situations, because most sysadmins using the wizard answer "yes" to the question "Do the above lines describe all the hosts that send mail from yourdomain.com?" I used this wizard when I first published SPF records, and answered yes to that question. I thought only of mail ORIGINATING from my domain, as most people would. If publishing '-all' is as dangerous as you say, shouldn't someone change the SPF Publishing Wizard to highlight the forwarding problem and recommend '~all' instead, at least for the time being? As many others have noted, I have not seen any bounced mail as a result of publishing '-all', but this is probably because most SPF-aware recipients are using SPF checks only as part of a larger spam scoring system, and are not rejecting based on SPF checks yet. Regards, Ryan