Re: Minimum length of secret key
Tony Finch <[email protected]> Sat, 24 Jul 2004 22:47:36 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.srs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004, Roger Moser wrote: > > SRS uses HMAC-SHA1 where the key is limited to 64 bits. What was the reason > to use HMAC-SHA1 instead of SHA-1 applied to the concatenation of a secret > key (without length limit) and the string to hash? The reason for using HMAC rather than simply using a cryptographic hash of the message and a key to form a MAC is that HMAC is more resistant to attacks that involve replay of the original data concatenated with data from the attacker. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ BERWICK ON TWEED TO WHITBY: WEST OR SOUTHWEST 2 OR 3 INCREASING 3 OR 4. FAIR. GOOD. SLIGHT OR SMOOTH.