Re: Qmail Patch Info

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:55:10PM +0000, Shevek wrote:
> If you're not tied into qmail for commercial reasons, I suggest looking
> at exim, which is much simpler and more powerful, is currently
> maintained, and doesn't have the religion of reimplementing libc,
> although the indentation in exim is nearly as horrible as that in qmail.

But at least ph10 includes comments :-)