Re: Cascaded Rewriting
Stephan Menzel <[email protected]> Tue, 12 Apr 2005 17:06:50 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.srs.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | GMX GmbH |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Dienstag, 12. April 2005 16:53 schrieb Mark: > When you re-code an existing SRS0 address, you essentially promote it to > an SRS1 address. This address can be reversed by srs_reverse. Whether you > can reverse the ensuing SRS0 address depends, of course, on whether you > signed it yourself (or have the key). Well, I can safely assume that. > The result of srs_reverse may be an SRS0 address itself. So, yes, if you > want to reverse that too, a second pass would be required. Since there is > no promoting SRS1 addresses to SRS2, etc, every reversal step should take > a two-pass maximum. OK. So it'll be best If I always do two passes to cover all those cases. Thanks a lot! Stephan