Re: Question abour SRS in sendmail

On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Michael Weiner wrote:

> As for SRS implementation in sendmail, i would hang on a little bit and
> check out SES, which is what SRS has evolved into over the past months.
> There are quite a few pages detailing how to implement ses/srs in
> sendmail, but the code has actually released there will be a milter to
> follow (i imagine) and some sendmail patches, etc.

SES is great for signing the return path.  But it doesn't help
with delivering bounces for forwarded mail.

Some people use SRS only to block forged bounces - and SES could be
an alternative for that purpose.  But for forwarding mail and
any resulting bounces, SRS is what you need.

-- 
	      Stuart D. Gathman <[email protected]>
    Business Management Systems Inc.  Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.