Re: greylisting and MAIL FROM signing
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> Tue, 16 Aug 2005 16:21:57 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.srs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 15:23 -0400, Stuart D. Gathman wrote: > > I have run into a sort of impedance mismatch between MAIL FROM signing and > > greylisting. > > > > 1. I send a message with signed MAIL FROM (old SES) > > 2. recipient rejects with 450 - try again in 300 minutes > > 3. sendmail tries again, but the timecode has changed, and so > > the recipients greylisting software thinks I'm a new sender. > > 4. go back to step 2 > > Reduce the precision of your timecode. I thought of that after posting. It doesn't help. Old SES also increments a sequence number for each outgoing message. There really needs to be a way for sendmail cf to recognize when we are retrying a deferred message. There probably is - sendmail cf isn't exactly the most clear and explicit language in the world... I might need to go back to SRS signing. -- Stuart D. Gathman <[email protected]> Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154 "Confutatis maledictis, flamis acribus addictis" - background song for a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.