Re: SRS whitelist
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Nov 2005 00:12:28 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.srs.general,gmane.mail.spam.spf.discuss |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Please continue this discussion on spf-discuss. It is off-topic on srs-discuss. David Woodhouse wrote: > The advice I gave is sound -- just don't bother, and if you find that > anybody _is_ using some random snake-oil scheme to reject the genuine > mail you forward, then just educate them not to. Unlike snake-oil, SPF does deliver on its promises. It just doesn't make the promises _you_ would like to hear. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDhQVswL7PKlBZWjsRAizMAJ9E8ooyfqKBJR+9wla2bOud2fHg9QCgoJxK XDvpxdbuCFxDgFK7QzzmsVE= =TcsB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----