RE: Weird problem with srs-socketmapd.0.32rc3.pl
Mark <[email protected]> Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:55:23 GMT
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.srs.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Asarian-host |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Muchnick [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: donderdag 22 december 2005 22:30 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [srs-discuss] Weird problem with srs-socketmapd.0.32rc3.pl > > I set up the 0.32rc3 installation on multiple servers and tested them to > be sure SRS was working and mails were getting through, especially for- > warding through one mail server in particular (call it "tampa") which > handles a particularly important forwarded email address. Most of the > testing was done from my servers, which all publish and run SPF1. Every- > thing was okay as of yesterday. SRS was working when "tampa" received > mail from servers with SPF (mine) and those without SPF (yahoo.com). > > Now I'm getting the old SPF broken forward problem on mail sent to the > forwarding address on "tampa": '[sending domain] does not designate ["- > tampa" IP address] as permitted sender'. > > Daemon srs-socketmapd is running and there have been exactly NO configu- > ration changes to sendmail since I started it after the SRS installa- > tion, when it *was* working. > > Anybody have a pointer where I should look as to why this spontaneous > meltdown of rewriting? Thanks. Hello Robert, What exactly is not working? There are many new ways to invoke the rewriting (all variations on options regarding class=w). To start with the most obvious question: you did regenerate your sendmail.cf, right? (with an option from the new m4). It would help if you showed me a header, or part of the sendmail log, to see with what sort of rewriting is occuring, and for what domains. It may be that no rewriting takes place, or rewriting for a domain in class w for which no SPF record exists. Feel free to contact me off-list about it, if you so desire. - Mark System Administrator Asarian-host.org --- "If you were supposed to understand it, we wouldn't call it code." - FedEx