Re: spfd vs postfix
Julian Mehnle <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:11:39 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.srs.general,gmane.mail.spam.spf.help |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Eddy Beliveau wrote: > I'm using postfix 2.2.3 > with perl-Mail-SPF-Query-1.999.1-1 > and spfd (# $Id: spfd 141 2006-02-07 00:04:51Z julian $) > > Then I did the following > > $ echo /usr/bin/spfd --set-user nobody --set-group nobody | at now > $ ps -ef | grep spfd > nobody 20791 20790 0 14:43 ? 00:00:00 /usr/bin/spfd > listening on TCP port 5970 > > [...] > > $ tail /var/log/messages > Mar 15 14:52:49 smtpext1 postfix/smtpd[12501]: warning: missing > attribute action in input from 127.0.0.1:5970 > Mar 15 14:52:49 smtpext1 postfix/smtpd[12501]: warning: problem talking > to server 127.0.0.1:5970: Success > > Did I miss something ? First, this question is more appropriate for spf-help, not for srs-discuss (or spf-discuss, for that matter). Yes, you missed something. You should not be using spfd as the Postfix policy daemon, but examples/postfix-policyd-spf instead. spfd is not what you think it is.