Re: Why SRS really sucks

>a) not a signature (both domains same or one empty)
>
>and
>
>b) not from a forwarder that you as a receiver have configured
>
>then it is spam and should be rejected.
>
>
>Anyone see a problem with these assumptions?  Is SRS ever legitimate
>for anything other than receiver requested forwarding or MFROM signing?

Not good enough.  "Signatures" can be for virtualized domains, where 
the virtual domain and the local domain of the mail host will both 
appear in the signature.


--
-- =========================
Tom Lahti
Tx3 Online Services

(888)4-TX3-SVC (489-3782)
http://www.tx3.net/
-- =========================