Re: Why SRS really sucks

> Yes. But SRS is the natural reaction to SPF, on the part of the many
> people out there who just don't care about SPF, or who think it is
> entirely broken in the first place.
 
A natural reaction should be to think about twice about consequences,
before implementing something without using the brain, and then clamining
the thing is broken... :-) 
 
> Those people have implemented SRS because they think it's the best option
for them, to
> work around the breakage which SPF has caused. That was always expected.
 
Logically, it is the best thing for THEM, they have their crap out of their
queue, resulting
they have not to deal with idiots (their customers) who mostly can not count
from 0 to 1,
and think they must use each thing what is available for free on the web,
mostly 
without reading the f... manual  ...
 
We know this type of user, but we are every day newly surprised by them,
once again ;-) 
 
> I've always said that as soon as SRS became common, SPF would be
> entirely defeated. Thanks for making that point so well.
 
This was the reason for me to open that thread.
I want to prevent SPF to become useless.
 
I´m known to be a hardliner. I hate spammers and this implements i hate
email forgery.
Every technics that makes it easier for spammers is therefore evil, no
matter what the
intention was, which did lead to its existence.
 
-- 
 
Johann Steigenberger 
Blacklistmaster at UCEPROTECT-Network 
http://www.uceprotect.net