Re: Why SRS really sucks
Tom Lahti <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:46:34 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.srs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>Actually we have one in our default Ruleset saying all evelopefrom which >are: >srs*=*.*=*@* should be rejected ... >To give the "well known provider" a name: > >Schlund & Partner - one of Europes biggest webhoster (also known as >kundenserver.de): > >https://service.schlund.de/service/news/news_neu.php3 Then you should be rejecting *@kundenserver.de, not srs*=*.*=*@*. Even rejecting srs*=*.*=*@kundenserver.de, which is what Stuart is suggesting, would be a far cry better. Do not condemn the rest of us (who do SRS signing to catch forged DSN) for Schlund & Partner's incompetence! -- -- ========================= Tom Lahti Tx3 Online Services (888)4-TX3-SVC (489-3782) http://www.tx3.net/ -- =========================