Re: Why SRS really sucks

Tom Lahti <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:46:34 -0800
Newsgroups gmane.mail.spam.srs.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
>Actually we have one in our default Ruleset saying all evelopefrom which
>are:
>srs*=*.*=*@* should be rejected ...


>To give the "well known provider" a name:
>
>Schlund & Partner - one of Europes biggest webhoster (also known as
>kundenserver.de):
>
>https://service.schlund.de/service/news/news_neu.php3

Then you should be rejecting *@kundenserver.de, not 
srs*=*.*=*@*.  Even rejecting srs*=*.*=*@kundenserver.de, which is 
what Stuart is suggesting, would be a far cry better.  Do not condemn 
the rest of us (who do SRS signing to catch forged DSN) for Schlund & 
Partner's incompetence!


--
-- =========================
Tom Lahti
Tx3 Online Services

(888)4-TX3-SVC (489-3782)
http://www.tx3.net/
-- =========================