Re: Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?

On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 18:24 -0800, Tom Lahti wrote:
> >And in answer to your third question -- of _course_ misdirected bounces
> >are a problem, and you know my solution.
> 
> Actually, we don't.  Is it the same as Johann's laughable "solution"; 
> the equivalent of running SpamAssassin?

http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html

Essentially the same principle as BATV, the original 'SES' before it
went off into the weeds, or self-signed SRS. 

Basically I sign the reverse-path on any genuine outgoing mail so it
looks like an SRS address. Then I never accept bounces to the 'raw'
address '[email protected]'. So anyone doing sender verification
callouts gets to reject faked mail, but _certainly_ I don't get bounces.

-- 
dwmw2