Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mark Jeftovic wrote:
> I guess the "Why SRS really sucks" thread reminded me that its time for
> me to poke my head up once again and ask what the current state of SRS
> is for an MTA like postfix 2.x
>
> So far there are only untested patches and nothing that can be used in a
> high volume production environment.

I'm no expert on SRS deployment, but I assume you have tried the 
libsrs2-based patch[1]?

Oh, BTW, I note that libsrs.org is now dead (AKA domain-grabbed). :-(

References:
 1. http://www.libsrs2.org/download.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEKYTiwL7PKlBZWjsRAmU3AJoCqSzmgbuvZl6nEQGYf9EpFN5F/QCfWeVc
JlULBpzWagZnKUDTY5mAtIY=
=eLCN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----