Re: Re: SRS: is there a stable implementation for postfix yet?

Hi Julian, I don't think I've tried that yet. I'll take a look at it in 
my copious spare time [tm] (my wife and I have just adopted a baby girl, 
  3 weeks old, so we're in a manic state around here)

-mark


Julian Mehnle wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Mark Jeftovic wrote:
> 
>>I guess the "Why SRS really sucks" thread reminded me that its time for
>>me to poke my head up once again and ask what the current state of SRS
>>is for an MTA like postfix 2.x
>>
>>So far there are only untested patches and nothing that can be used in a
>>high volume production environment.
> 
> 
> I'm no expert on SRS deployment, but I assume you have tried the 
> libsrs2-based patch[1]?
> 
> Oh, BTW, I note that libsrs.org is now dead (AKA domain-grabbed). :-(
> 
> References:
>  1. http://www.libsrs2.org/download.html
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFEKYTiwL7PKlBZWjsRAmU3AJoCqSzmgbuvZl6nEQGYf9EpFN5F/QCfWeVc
> JlULBpzWagZnKUDTY5mAtIY=
> =eLCN
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> -------
> To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, 
> please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/[email protected]
>