Re: Why SRS really sucks

On 3/28/06, Tom Lahti <[email protected]> wrote:

> There is no way in heck you should be pulling apart someone else's
> rewritten local part and trying to make sense of it, and worse --
> doing something with "information" based on your assumptions that you
> know what it means.

http://www.libsrs2.org/srs/srs.pdf describes a format that allows
reconstructing the old return address.  What planet do you live on,
Tom, and how is the weather there?

> If what you are suggesting comes to pass, I'll make up my own
> proprietary SRS/RPR-like rewriting scheme, (maybe even encrypting the
> whole thing with a private key to prevent someone from even
> attempting to make sense of it), and I won't share it :P

And I won't be receiving e-mail forwarded through your service.