Re: Why SRS really sucks
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:11:15 -0500 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.srs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Tom Lahti wrote: > >badly with greylisters. But ultimately, I can configure my SRS > >to use any prefix I want to get around people mistaking my > >signatures for SRS forwards. I can also change the char set > >and delimiters used to get around the '+' idiots. > > I'm envisioning taking the entire SRS local part and > encrypting/encoding it into a stream of letters/numbers that are all > legal address characters. They would then be indistinguishable from, > say, an actual username made up of seemingly random letters and > numbers. Indistinguishable, that is, by any MTA exception my own :) That is what SES did. But then they made the timestamp too precise to work with greylisters. That could be a good extension for SRS in sign mode, though. I could use resuse the bitpacket code from SES. -- Stuart D. Gathman <[email protected]> Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154 "Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.