Re: Why SRS really sucks
"Stuart D. Gathman" <[email protected]> Sun, 2 Apr 2006 17:40:22 -0400 (EDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.srs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Stephan Menzel wrote: > If I only do SRS when the sending domain is SPF protected, what would happen > to te other protection forms similar to SPF like Sender ID? Sender-ID does not validate MAIL FROM. So it is unaffected by whatever you do with MAIL FROM. However, Sender-ID wants you to do something similar with the 'Sender' mail header field. > Those protection schemes also benefit from SRS and I would break them if I > only perform SRS when a 'real' SPF record is there. Those other protection schemes are concerned with the RFC2822 mail headers fields. They don't validate MAIL FROM (except SES). -- Stuart D. Gathman <[email protected]> Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154 "Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.