EHLO vs PTR for validation
"Johann Steigenberger" <[email protected]> Mon, 3 Apr 2006 16:48:02 +0000 (UTC)
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.srs.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Stuart,=0D =0D >> We make a decision on smtp dialog after rcpt to:=0D >> =0D >> RCPT TO: [email protected]=0D >> 550 Your mail was rejected, because your Server has no PTR. To have an= =0D >> exception made for you emailaddress contact us using the form on ...=0D =0D This was an example only ...=0D =0D [Offtopic]=0D <lots of stuff about helo removed>=0D UCEPROTECT-Policys have very complex rulesets:=0D =0D Standard is on a NON-PTR Situation to check:=0D 1. If Spamtrap hit =0D 2. If Client is responsible as MX for claimed sender domain=0D 3. If Domain has SPF- records set which autorize that IP for that domain=0D 4. If Client is an insecured Windows client :-)=0D 5. If Client tries multiple simultan connections within a short timeframe .. .=0D and 10 other Tests also .....=0D =0D If 1 is true -> Check if System is on the Neverblacklist ,if yes-> reject= =20 - If not -> Blacklist =0D If 2 is true - > Accept=0D If 4 ist true - > Reject=0D if 5 is true - > sub1 Check if Client tries different Helos -> If yes reject ....=0D If sub 1 on Rule 5 is false and 4 is false and 3 is true -> accept ...=0D =0D Hopefully you understand the power of having dependent and independent rules ...=0D =0D [Offtopic off]=0D =0D -- =0D =0D Johann Steigenberger =0D Blacklistmaster at UCEPROTECT-Network =0D http://www.uceprotect.net