RE: Re: SRS for postfix ?

=20
>> Apart from that paragraph, the preceding references to the Postfix
architecture may be a bit better.=20=20
>> I do not however grok the implementation logic given for the delivery
agent.

I did, and the logic proposed is decent, although the author focused on
the shady aspects of it.

The idea of creating a patch that is absolutely perfect and has all
possible problems taken care of beforehand is too strong to be
practical, and the author used this to argue that "it will never work".=20

I think the authors/promoters of SPF/SRS should engage directly in this
issue and provide the community with good and simple implementations of
SPF/SRS for each every major version of populars MTAs.

If this was done it would sooner prove or disprove any doubts about the
usefulness and viability of widespread SPF/SRS usage.

Best Regards,
Gabriel Blum

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

The information in this Internet email is confidential and may be legally p=
rivileged.  It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this email =
by anyone else is unauthorized.