Re: TMDA 1.0.x end of life
"Jason R. Mastaler" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Go to http://mla.libertine.org/tmda-users/ and search for "SPF" - there has been discussion about this in the past. TMDA has capabilities to deal with SPF already. Some users add a filtering rule like the following for example: # SPF has marked it as forged. Do not confirm it. headers 'Received-SPF: fail' hold But Stephen has the better idea - handle it in the MTA if possible. On 9/19/06 3:01 PM, Josh Hildebrand wrote: > Has there been any talk of making the challenges a little friendlier by > giving us the option of adhering to SPF records? > > i.e. not blasting back a challenge to a forged from address if the > forged domain has an SPF record that clearly states that the email was > forged? > > I keep getting put on the damn SpamCop blacklist due to challenge > responses. I think combining SPF lookups intelligently into TMDA would > be a great feature. > > -Josh