spamcop problems.
"Josh Hildebrand" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.spam.tmda.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Good point. But I still see some value in TMDA supporting SPF a bit. For instance, it would be nice to have an option to simply trust emails that meet an SPF record's requirements.. ignoring the "~all" flag, of course. I'm interested in hearing what others have done to counteract SpamCop's blacklists.. it seems they have set up "traps" to blacklist all challenge response systems. ;( -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Warren [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 4:15 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Josh Hildebrand Subject: Re: TMDA 1.0.x end of life Josh Hildebrand wrote: > Has there been any talk of making the challenges a little friendlier by > giving us the option of adhering to SPF records? This is probably a job for the MTA itself - during initial inbound mail acceptance, the SPF record should be checked, and the mail rejected/dropped right then.